If you get your news from the NY Times, ABC, CBS, NBC and/or NPR, you may never have even heard of “Gun-Walker.” But you will.
The modern American political scandal benchmark is Watergate. This is clear when every new scandal has “-gate” added to it. Democrats still crow about how evil Richard Nixon was because of Watergate and how it reveals the evil nature of Republicans.
Watergate was a third-rate burglary of the Democratic National Committee’s temporary headquarters located in the Watergate Hotel. It was a bungled burglary whose acknowledged goal was to steal Democratic campaign strategies so that they could be marginalized. Whether Richard Nixon initiated the burglary or not, he clearly attempted to cover it up and used the power of the Presidency to intimidate those who investigated the event. Even assuming that the burglary was done at the behest of Republican leadership, the goal was for the Republicans to gain an edge in the upcoming election. An election that Richard Nixon ended up winning by an historic landslide even without the secret Democrat strategies. So in the end, as vile and reprehensible as the burglary was, it actually had no impact on the election it was attempting to influence, and ironically became the singular event which caused Nixon to resign and brought us into the arms of the idiot Jimmy Carter. I think the country has suffered much much more from the backlash than the actual burglary could ever have done.
But nobody died. Nobody committed treason. Nobody conspired with foreign criminals. Nobody spent millions of dollars of taxpayer money.
Drax, who comments regularly on this blog, has suggested for years that Obama is pursuing the Cloward-Piven strategy. I have consistently been skeptical of such overt socialist goals, although I have long conceded that Obama is clearly a hard left collectivist at heart. But I have not accepted the idea that even Obama would actively work to destabilize the American economy and government just for the sake of using the resulting crisis as a way to permanently transform the USA into a socialist state.
But then there’s Gun-Walker.
The more that comes out about this scandal the worse it looks. And the larger it looks. Watergate is a schoolyard prank compared to Gun-Walker. There is no way to analyze the events involved in Gun-Walker without concluding that elements of the Obama administration deliberately undertook actions that they knew would result in the deaths of innocent people, provide drug cartels with millions of dollars and destabilize the Mexican government.
In case you aren’t clear on what Gun-Walker is, it was a secret program designed to make military grade weapons available to Mexican drug cartels and to provide those same drug cartels with the money to buy those weapons. This was done at the same time that the Obama administration was publicly accusing US gun merchants of selling guns to those same cartels. In the end some of those very guns sold to Mexican drug cartels using US taxpayer money to buy them were used to kill at least one, and probably more, American border guard. That’s not even counting the Mexican police and citizenry killed with those same weapons.
It is very hard to look at these events and not conclude that elements within the Obama administration were deliberately attempting to destabilize the Mexican government and increase the violence within a neighboring country. How high this goes is a very important question, and one that even the mainstream media is starting to wonder about.
But why would anyone want to destabilize the Mexican government while attempting to put the blame for that destabilization on American gun merchants?
Usually when I am trying to puzzle out the motivations for an action, I look first at who would benefit from the action. So who would benefit from Gun-Walker?
There are two major obvious impacts from Gun-Walker. First, the flood of US guns into Mexico would give a huge issue for gun control advocates to use to attempt to further impose gun control legislation or to even attempt to repeal the Second Amendment. Second, the destabilization and increased violence in Mexico would likely cause a huge increase in illegal immigration into the US.
Both of these are major goals of the Leftist leadership of the Democrat party. It is hard not to conclude that this operation was concieved, coordinated and funded by very high level members of the Obama administration. Very high. And the purpose appears to have been to delibarately increase violence in a neighboring country while also attempting to subvert the existing Constitution.
So I am more or less forced to conclude that whether Obama himself is Cloward-Piven driven, he has put into positions of great power people who are pursuing that strategy.
This is scary.
7 users commented in " What does Gun-Walker mean? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI agree with Drax. Cloward-Pivens is alive and well in the Obama adminstration. They’ve already publically acknowledged that a good crisis should be exploited to achieve political objectives that would otherwise be difficult if not impossible. It’s a very small mental leap to begin thinking that crises can also be manufactured…and then exploited. In terms of the economy, it would explain why Obama continues to double-down on ‘solutions’ that have already failed multiple times…
I hear you. I can’t really put much of an argument forth against that claim. It would, in fact, explain many, many things that are inexplicable otherwise. But to accuse the President, or any prominent public official, of what amounts to treasonous actions is a hard, hard jump for me to take.
More and more lately I have been taking to heart a key phrase in the A Song of Ice and Fire, “Winter is coming.”
I have begun to truly fear for the future of my family, this nation and the world. And I put the blame for the coming economic meltdown squarely at the feet of generations of liberal policies which have bankrupted our coffers, exhausted our resources and demoralized our people.
For much of my life I have considered liberals to be, by and large, decent but naive and ignorant people. But that is changing. I am finding myself more and more angry at the idiocy of the left and the slavish adherance to social policies that any reasonable thinking person would cast aside if they truly wanted to promote freedom, justice and liberty. Not to mention economic growth and a higher quality of life.
A fundamental underpinning of Cloward/Piven is to overburden the economy by forcing it to meet ever increasing demands – welfare, food stamps, health care, social security, social security disability, and suchlike.
But, once you’re in the driver’s seat, you can pretty well just do it all in one budget, can’t you? A couple of trillion in printed money, more in monetized debt. Just load it on the mule until it breaks.
What he was when he came into office was clear. Until he was forced to moderate his language in order to gain the Democrat nomination and, then, the Presidency, he made no secret of what he was and what he believed.
What he has done was entirely predictable (and, in large part, was predicted by a few of us who have no problem calling a spade a spade.)
[...] BUT when our government finances the purchases of the weapons used for these 200 deaths, so that they purposefully get sold to people in this underworld drug culture at the border to cross the border and they don’t bother to tell the government of the other side of the border about this great plan and where these weapons are going to, it certainly makes one start to believe that maybe what those crazies are saying about Obama not just being naive but actually, purposefully going after some crazy left wing agenda is right. [...]
A little off topic. Didn’t Gordon Liddy claim that the break-in was engineered by John Dean for the sole purpose of finding out whether Dean’s girlfriend (who worked in that office) was running a prostitution ring?
I’m pretty sure he made the claim, Dean sued him over it…but withdrew the suit. My memory is fuzzy, but I’m pretty sure Liddy still sticks with that story.
Like I said, my memory is fuzzy. But, it makes more sense than a Presidential campaign headed to a landslide win risking calamity.
Makes more sense to me anyway.
Andy, that’s a new one on me. Of course I never read Liddy’s book.
As I have been saying, it is worse than we think. Obama and progressives won’t be satisfied until there is a Latin America style leftist take-over:
http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the_dome/perdue_suggests_suspending_congressional_elections_for_two_years_was_she_serious (Although the headline states that it was a “joke,” the text clearly implies that it was neither delivered nor intended as such.)
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/94940/peter-orszag-democracy?page=0,0&passthru=MGU3YjMxNDdlN2UyMjM2MTNhZGZjNDE2MjE2NjE2Nj
Those are just two headlines on today’s Drudge report.
Today’s.
This consolidation of governmental power through direct legislative action where possible, court action where available, regulatory/administrative where the other options are not viable – and a yearning (expressed several times by the President himself) to dispense with Congress and the Constitution as they are impediments to “getting things done” — has been going on for three years now.
I said it when he took over that he reminded me of Mussolini and have several times warned (on this blog) that, yes – IT CAN HAPPEN HERE.
And, it will – if things don’t change and in a hurry.
Leave A Reply