Yep, you read that right.
How the heck did that happen? Did I fire off the final four chapters in a blinding rush of alcohol fueled keyboarding?
No, here’s what happened.
I have been struggling for months with the ending of the first book of the three-part series of books. And I’ve struggled with WHY I’ve been stuggling. I have been unable to bring the book to a conclusion because where it is right now feels like the story is building, not concluding.
And last night I figured out why.
I finished the book quite literally years ago. I just didn’t know it. I had plunged forward in my writing frenzy into the content of the second book without realizing I had crossed the logical end point to book 1.
But I reread the entire book over the past few days and last night the reality hit me like a ton of bricks.
I was writing book 2 now. Not book 1. Book 1 was done. Now I just need to go back and start the laborious process of editing and rewriting portions of it. And I already have a start on Book 2.
But. And it’s a big but. There is a potential problem.
See, the natural, logical end point for the first book is at a point when the protagonist has just been ignominiously defeated and effectively driven out of his homeland while his massively superior enemy not only maintains control of that land, but threatens the entire world.
So the question is, if a book ends on such a note, will that turn readers off? Or if there is enough foreshadowing of the protagonist rising to a new level of power in the new land where he can meet his enemies on a more even basis and actually have a chanc of defeating them, does that make the reader want to read on?
It is a conundrum.
The other option is to add something to the end of the book which shows the protagonist may have just received a crushing military defeat, but he somehow at the same time achieves a more important personal victory.
But that would be part of the rewrite.
6 users commented in " So.. um.. I finished my book. "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackTrilogy.
Three acts. Sounds about right for a first act.
so long as the reader knows that Act Two is coming, it’s no problem.
I think Drax is right. But, what do I know?
I’m not wordsmith enough to know how to tell the reader that another volume is coming up, so it’s not hopeless without just saying, “Hey y’all! It ain’t over. There’s another book coming!!!”
I don’t think that would work.
Maybe an epilogue?
But, what do I know?
Well, I telegraph it pretty thoroughly I think. The last three chapters the protagonist (Lirak) is being told by everyone, including one of the gods themselves, that he needs to move on to his new duties. And I do my best to end the book with a clear and obvious “Book 2 is even better!” ending. Dunno if it works, but I’ll find out. I sent it to a friend who has been doing critiques of it for a couple years now and she doesn’t know I decided to end it the way I did, so her reaction should be a good guide to a general reader’s reaction.
Remember, Tolkien’s “The Two Towers” ended with Frodo being taken prisoner by the Orcs and Sam giving up on the Quest of the Ring to go and try to rescue Frodo. And the first segment ended with Gondor being under seige and the orcs hurling the heads of their defeated soldiers into the city.
So there is pretty solid precedence for ending a book on a down note.
Congrats! I look forward to reading it…
Ending on a down note isn’t bad, as long as there is a hint that there is the possibility of redemption coming.
Thinking about it, LOTR actually ended on major down points in both the FOTR and TTT. Gandalf died, the Fellowship broke up, Merry and Pippen were captured, Boromir was dying and Frodo and Sam had split off on their own on a suicide mission.
I think that’s pretty much a downer…
Leave A Reply