Back in the sixties and seventies there was a major national push to “clean up” our state, federal and private mental hospitals. I remember some of that, although I was pretty young at the time. The media inundated the populace with lurid tales of forced lobotomization, over prescribing dangerous drugs, physically restraining “patients” and the supposed use of mental institutions as psychiatric and medical experimentation centers. As a result of those reports, congressional action was initiated which greatly increased the hurdles that patients had to clear to get “forced” into such institutions and greatly reduced the funding of those institutions based on the belief that fewer patients meant lower costs.
The end result has been a devastating social cost with our prisons now overflowing with mentally ill who receive little or no appropriate treatment, and huge numbers of mentally ill living as homeless individuals, unable to consistently exercise the life skills required to maintain the suitable economic and/or social status to live in a home or apartment. Many, many more live with family members who do their best to deal with their needs but who are ill equipped to do so.
The United States gets plenty of unearned and downright unfactual criticism for our national health care system, but one area of our system which is truly well below the standards of most “civilized” countries is the state of our mental health system.
If anything good comes out of the recent Tucson tragedy, I hope it will be a national conversation (a rational, intelligent one) about how we deal with the mentally ill.
Most estimates show that over half of the people in prison and over half of our homeless are mentally ill.
This is a national embarrassment and it should be something the new Congress tries to address.
3 users commented in " What Tucson should teach us "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback“I hope it will be a national conversation (a rational, intelligent one)”
Ah..heh…heh…ha…ha…ha..Ha…ha HA HAH HAW…!!
Man, that was a good one. I’m still laughing..
… and people call ME the cynical one….
My understanding though (I thought the timeframe for these abuses was different – in the 1920s or 30s or something) was that things like this *did* happen to mental patients.
Just checked: (1939 – 1951) Walter Freeman’s lobotomy fad.
In any case, lobotomies tended to shut people up, so no-one complained that they were basically destroying the higher thought of their patients and leaving them inert half-vegetables.
Apparently it was even recommended to treat relatively mild problems, such as depression, or undefinable problems such as “criminality” and “aggression”.
***
As for the social cost – the mentally ill might indeed be out on the streets in greater numbers. Personally, though, I think the bar needs to be very high to *force* anyone into anything.
I *would* suggest more voluntary mental shelters, but there are problems with those too: 1. They would become plugged with people who just want to freeride. 2. If anyone did need to avail themselves of the service, they would basically be condemning themselves to a lifetime of institutionalization, because they wouldn’t be able to get credit, or insurance, or a job afterwards – mentally ill is a pretty nasty black-mark to try to explain away.
Leave A Reply