… unknowingly…

The article is called “The neuroscience of screwing up”. It’s about how scientists are human beings, and as such conform to a status quo and reject evidence that is counter to their preconceived notions. The hilarious thing is that the writers of this article have just explained exactly how and why climate science has become a belief system and how absurd it is to talk about climate “consensus.”

Wired is a big AGW supporter, btw, with contstant editorials and stories derisively attacking AGW “deniers.” One wonders if even the writers of this article will be able to acknowledge it’s direct and compelling application to one of their own sacred cows.

I find this sort of thing quite hilarious.