So… four months ago Barack Obama looked like a juggernaut as he systematically dismantled Hillary Clinton’s supposedly unstoppable storm troopers. John McCain looked like an accidental nominee who simply outlasted his competition, each of whom seemed to have one insurmountable vulnerability which inevitably torpedoed them as they tried to separate themselves from the rest of the GOP pretenders.
At that time I truly believed that by August Obama would have a 25 point lead in the polls and Republicans would be tearing each others hearts out.
Instead we have a statistical dead heat in many of the most well-known political polls as the two parties head into their nomination.
What happened?
Well… I think two things happened, and they are, of course, interrelated.
First we saw that Hillary finally managed to score a hit on Obama, even though it was far too late for her to stop Obama’s march to Denver. But what that hit did manage to do is the same sort of thing that happened to Captain Cook in Hawaii. Much like Obama, Cook was revered as a god by the indigenous people of the islands. And Cook took advantage of that to set up a little kingdom of his own. But one day some angry Hawaiian managed to get a spear or knife past Cook’s guards and the resulting wound bled real, palpable human blood. And gods don’t bleed. Once the illusion of divinity had been punctured, the rest of the Hawaiians no longer thought that Cook was divine, and with his aura of invulnerability erased, they turned on him and beat him to death.
Now I don’t expect the American public to get violent with Obama, but politically I think that when Hillary’s final desperate attacks drew blood, a large part of Obama’s messiah myth was exposed and a large fraction of previously enamored Obama-ites looked up, rubbed their eyes and said “hey, this Obama guy is just like all the other politicians after all.” And that allowed McCain to exploit the same weaknesses Hillary exposed and to expand upon that with a clever campaign of ads designed to expose Obama’s true weaknesses.
But the other part of the answer to why Obama has lost all that momentum is really due to a flurry of serious mistakes by Obama and his top campaign advisers. Obama’s trip to Europe was not the public relations bonanza the Obama team expected. Instead it came across to most of middle America as unbelievable arrogance and self-admiration. His flip flops on a series of issues have been received as rank political poll pandering that typifies the opportunistic populist wanna-be. McCain and other Republican efforts to paint Obama as an inexperienced celebrity lightweight have been far more successful than I think even Obama realizes yet. The biggest weapon against arrogance and conceit has always been ridicule and humor, and Obama has made himself a juicy target for attacks that focus on his preening, self-important verbosity.
And that’s one of the main reasons that the Biden pick is such a horrible pick for Obama. It plays perfectly into the stereotype that McCain and the RNC have been painting for Obama. It gives the Republicans the opportunity to say “See, not only do WE see that Obama is a political babe-in-the-woods who needs his hand held by more savvy and experienced handlers, but Obama HIMSELF has admitted it with this pick of Biden to ‘balance out’ the ticket.” That’s the reason the McCain camp trotted out the Joe Biden quotes from the primary where Biden stands by his forceful accusation that Obama is not ready to lead.
So now you have Hillary Clinton telling the country that Obama is not ready to lead. Obama’s own actions have demonstrated a serious lack of political savvy, and now his own Vice President is on TV repeatedly telling the country how lame Obama is, while Obama’s face in the background takes on a pained, whiny expression that looks exactly like a man whose fragile ego has been punctured.
This “not ready to lead” theme and meme is potentially powerful enough to defeat Obama. Hopefully McCain can keep it front and center with fresh material for the next few months, while simultaneously targeting Obama’s insane Leftist policy proposals and exposing them for the socialist twaddle that they are.
If McCain manages to scratch out a win in November, the first person he should publicly thank for the win should be Hillary Rodham Clinton.
17 users commented in " Midnight Messiah myth musings "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback[...] Cosmic Conservative makes an interesting comparison. [...]
I continue to maintain that McCain will win by electoral landslide.
Well, unless he picks Lieberman. If he does that, I have no clue what would happen. Would he pick up enough votes to counter those he would lose? Would those votes come from Hillary supporters who weren’t already going McCain?
While I don’t like Romney as a choice as his baggage is pretty heavy, I’m coming to the conclusion that he would be the safest choice. At least he’s currently pro-life.
I actually share Romney’s religious views, but I never liked the guy. Seemed too much like a car salesman to me…
Maybe I just don’t like salesmen.
I am in the Romney camp. Of course I wanted him as the nominee, but I am OK with him as Veep and a potential nominee in the future.
McCain himself is the enticement to middle-of-the-roaders, independents and disaffected Democrats. He needs someone to pull in the religious right and Reagan conservatives. Romney is the best choice for that outside of a Jeb Bush or a Condi Rice. The problem McCain has with those choices is that right now anyone associated with the Bush regime is pure political poison, so he has to go afield of some really great choices and pick someone who is the best compromise between conservative values and a plausible deniability of any Bush connections. Romney is the best choice for that.
Although, in reality, Mike Huckabee would not be a disastrous choice, from a purely political perspective. He’s a better choice for McCain than Biden was for Obama I think.
Still, I’m rooting for Romney.
Romney’s loudest nay-sayers ARE the “religious right.”
Drax: I have to completely agree with you on your “McCain landslide” prediction. I know that Cosmic thinks it is going to be close. I just don’t…or maybe I just “don’t want to” believe that this nation would elect Obama.
When you break it all down, Obama won a lot of caucuses in small states, and primaries in States with a lot of blacks (many of which are going to go to McCain in the election anyway). Radicals love caucuses! They love a mob scene, and will turn out in droves. Hillary won all the big primaries…and I just have to believe that McCain will win most of those big States. He won’t win CA, or NY, or MA…but most everything else is in play.
There really aren’t that many radicals in the US. (God help us if there are)
I really believe that this is McCain’s election to lose. He could screw it up as Cosmic said with a bad VP pick. But it would have to be a “really, really bad” pick. (Olympia Snow, and Ron Paul come to mind). I don’t think Romney hurts him at all. I don’t think Romney especially helps him either. This is going to be about McCain v. Obama.
I am a member of the Christian right. And I can tell you, there is a lot of bluster and boil…but they ain’t staying home and letting Obama appoint the next three Supreme Court justices.
Andy: Some ALWAYS “stay home.” In every party, in every election. The NUMBER that does changes, lessening with the level of excitement the potential voters feel about the choices they’ve been given.
A pro-choice VP would greatly lessen that excitement. Romney is, at best, “currently” pro-life and has been pro-choice in the past.
While I don’t ascribe to some of those who are consumed with Mormon hating conspiracies and bigotry, I recognize that there are SOME who won’t vote for Romney simply because he’s a Mormon (just as there are some who won’t vote for Obama just because he’s black or Hillary just because she’s a woman).
It is important WHERE those people LIVE, as the NUMBERS will be only a small (very small) percentage. If they live in a state that is close, their lack of excitement about the candidate (and their VP choice) may swing the state.
We’ll see. I think that most Republicans would have voted for ANYONE rather than Obama and wouldn’t care if HILLARY was his running mate.
Oh. Romney. I could care less about his “gravitas” or his “snake oil salesman” persona (which is what he feels like to me). What I care about are the MORMONS he’ll get to the voting booths in some VERY CLOSE states. (Why isn’t it bigotry to vote FOR someone because they ARE something when it is bigotry to vote against them because they are…? Ah well…)
I also care about his ORGANIZATION and his ability to RAISE MONEY.
It’s a good plus that he looks good on camera and can hold his own in a debate (so long as he doesn’t come off as an arrogant SOB as he so often did in the Primary debates).
It’s hard to imagine Romney coming off as an arrogant SOB in a debate with Joe Biden. It’s hard to imagine ANYONE coming off as an arrogant SOB in a debate with Joe Biden. I think Slow Joe has the market cornered on that commodity.
CC: I agree with that! Those two egos either will find peaceful co-existence or both their heads will blow up to the great amusement of the viewers.
I agree with Andy, the bluster of the primary season from the Religious Right about Romney being a Mormon will be trumped by his general reputation as a solid moral values person, even WITH the history of his past statements on abortion.
But if you want to pursue that logic, then you have to conclude that the absolute best pick that McCain could make would be Mike Huckabee. Huckabee would be McCain’s version of LBJ.
I frankly think that Huck would BE the best choice. He’s solidly pro-choice. He would rev up the voting engines of the evangelicals. He has the ability to cut to the quick with humor and doesn’t shy from calling a spade a spade (can I say that?)
Huck is LIKEABLE. And, frankly, he has the CHARISMA that ALL of the other Republicans don’t possess.
I like Huckabee even less than Romney, heh. He seemed to me to be a bit of a ranter… a bit shrill… and the way he stayed in the race past his welcome seemed rather like he was delusional about his own value.
I don’t know his motivation in staying in the race. Frankly, it made me scratch my head.
Was it to keep the Republicans in the headlines, at least a bit, even though their primaries were “over” while Obama/Clinton filled the airwaves?
Was it because he started something and wouldn’t stop until it was “over?” (This is his explanation. He wasn’t “beat” until he was “beat.”
Was it to give him more national exposure since he had the money and the spotlight for a future run at President, a slot on McCain’s ticket, a job as an analyst?
Was it to keep the issues he cared about the most in the forefront, letting McCain FEEL the dissatisfaction of the “conservative” wing of the Republican party?
All the above?
Dunno.
My analysis, for what it is worth, which is about what you pay for it, is that Huckabee was trying to play for a media gig or a run in 2012 or both.
I do think Huckabee might be an inspired choice, or a disaster, I can’t quite make up my mind which.
Well Drax: I scratched my quickly balding head along with you as Huck stayed in the race. But the truth is that Huck only shared one issue with the Conservative wing of the Republican Party…abortion.
The guy was a disaster as Governor of Arkansas. Under his goobernorship, Arkansas lost Republican Senators, and Congressmen. Even though I count myself as part of the Christian Right, guys like Huckabee really rub me the wrong way.
I’d take Romney any day as a VP (or as President). He would destroy Biden in the one debate that they would have. And besides all that…way too much has been made of the distrust of Mormonism by Evangelicals. Don’t forget, Bob Jones endorsed Romney! The media loves to create a story where there really isn’t one.
Huckabee is like the gnat that you swat at all afternoon. He really thinks he is important…really bothers you…and screws up an otherwise nice day. But you finally slap your own cheek, and he’s gone (never to be heard from again, I hope).
Leave A Reply