My son is in 6th grade and his class in divided up into 2 different groups called ‘pods’. Each pod does the same course work, takes the same number of tests and is expected to achieve at the same level to earn an ‘A’. At the end of last year the other pod’s students and teachers were treated to a huge, expensive party to celebrate their perceived academic achievements. They enjoyed a fun-filled field trip, food, cake, ice cream and confetti. Apparently, all the fun was sponsored by the parent of one of the kids who works for a large corporation. The media even showed up to interview the children, parents and teachers and congratulate them on their impressive achievements.
In spite of protests from the students and parents of my son’s pod, school administrators justified the disparity claiming that the quality of academic achievement was clearly inferior in the pod that was not invited to the party, and only the most studious kids deserve to be so richly rewarded. This is pure nonsense given the fact that both pods did virtually identical course work and achieved at a similarly high level.
To add insult to injury, the administration intends to continue rewarding the ‘smartest’ pod with perks and parties. As a result, the most academically gifted kids are talking about transferring from my son’s pod to the other pod at the end of this year. They reason it’s the surest way for them to get a free party…and get on TV. Given the administration’s intent and the fact that many of the smartest kids are now trying to get into the winning pod, it seems inevitable that the same kids will be getting all the rewards year in and year out.
Obviously, this is outrageous.
Does it seem vaguely familiar to you?
5 users commented in " This is BS… "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackDoes it seem vaguely familiar to you?
Reminds me of 7th grade when Mr. Hill established a ‘dummy’ row on one side of his classroom. Earn a grade below ‘D’ and off you went. Could you ever get back? Never.
One frickin’ ‘D’ on a pop quiz the first week and I was on the dummy row for the rest of the semester. I really hated that.
Um, aside from that, no. I might be missing something.
Brian: The story is my admittedly lame attempt to satirize college football’s evil, corrupt BCS system. If you imagine one pod consists of BCS schools and the other pod non-BCS schools it may start to make a little more sense. The administration, of course, consists of the NCAA, college/conference presidents, and the media.
I love college football, but absolutely detest the BCS. It’s a system based purely on greed. It’s anti-competitive. Heck, it’s anti-American.
I am a bit distracted tonight and didn’t immediately get your comparison until the end where you said “the administration intends to continue rewarding the ’smartest’ pod with perks and parties”.
I think you make valid points. I am no fan of the BCS either, but I’m not sure the old Bowl system was much better, or that a playoff system will be even better still, although my own personal preference is for a playoff system.
But at the root, as has been clear for a long time, money rules academia, as much as ivory tower academics want to believe it’s the other way around.
The story is my admittedly lame attempt to satirize college football’s evil, corrupt BCS system.
Ah. Thanks!
There are bigger battles to fight than being kept out of exclusive parties in the 6th grade. Just wait until some jerk of a co-worker accuses your kid of sexism in college and tries to bring down administrative action on him.
Leave A Reply