<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random synapse activity, 11/11/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047</link>
	<description>Rational Conservatism from the Rocky Mountains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:37:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dadman</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491427</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491427</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re interested in some good TV I have two suggestions:  John and Adams.  I&#039;ve said it before, but it is probably the best TV production I&#039;ve ever seen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested in some good TV I have two suggestions:  John and Adams.  I&#8217;ve said it before, but it is probably the best TV production I&#8217;ve ever seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CosmicConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491302</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmicConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491302</guid>
		<description>I never developed a real interest in college sports. Not even when I was in college. I like to see LSU do well, and I pay attention to CU, CSU and UNC a bit. But I&#039;m not really a fan of any college team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never developed a real interest in college sports. Not even when I was in college. I like to see LSU do well, and I pay attention to CU, CSU and UNC a bit. But I&#8217;m not really a fan of any college team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491299</guid>
		<description>Monday Night Football lost me after Cosell, and Meredith left.

In the good old days when Dandy Don got Howard to sing, &quot;Once I had an old blue dog...made that possum walk that log...&quot; well...

That was good sports broadcasting!  

I loved Gifford, and Al Michaels...and even though Pam couldn&#039;t stand to listen to John Madden in his early days as a sportscaster, she finally learned to love him...even though she doesn&#039;t know a field goal from a forfeit.

I watch occasionally.  But I&#039;ve lost my interest in NFL football.  I just watch all the guys that get paid to play on Saturday. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday Night Football lost me after Cosell, and Meredith left.</p>
<p>In the good old days when Dandy Don got Howard to sing, &#8220;Once I had an old blue dog&#8230;made that possum walk that log&#8230;&#8221; well&#8230;</p>
<p>That was good sports broadcasting!  </p>
<p>I loved Gifford, and Al Michaels&#8230;and even though Pam couldn&#8217;t stand to listen to John Madden in his early days as a sportscaster, she finally learned to love him&#8230;even though she doesn&#8217;t know a field goal from a forfeit.</p>
<p>I watch occasionally.  But I&#8217;ve lost my interest in NFL football.  I just watch all the guys that get paid to play on Saturday. <img src='http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491292</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491292</guid>
		<description>So far i&#039;ve been intrigued by SGU - mostly to see what it&#039;ll morph into.  Huge fan of SG-1 and slightly lesser degree of SG-A.  Although I thought SG-1 went downhill a bit when Anderson got the promotion to General.

we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far i&#8217;ve been intrigued by SGU &#8211; mostly to see what it&#8217;ll morph into.  Huge fan of SG-1 and slightly lesser degree of SG-A.  Although I thought SG-1 went downhill a bit when Anderson got the promotion to General.</p>
<p>we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CosmicConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491275</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmicConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491275</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll probably regeret this since S:U is the only TV show I watch right now and I watch it with the Cosmic Wife, but here is my opinion of the show:

1. It&#039;s pace is glacial. And the glaciers are melting. It&#039;s not just that nothing happens, it&#039;s that nothing takes FOREVER to happen. And then you get to more nothing.

2. I really do think that the show&#039;s production team was told to do the show on the smallest possible budget. I just can&#039;t come up with any other reason for the stories they&#039;ve come up with so far, all of which are filmed in the least interesting settings imaginable. Interminable shots in the desert. Interminable shots in the tiny area of the ship they are able to get to. Interminable shots in contemporary earth settings. With modern computer graphics capability I can&#039;t understand why they can&#039;t tell stories that have some remotely interesting setting. So I have to conclude that even the cost of a green screen or two is too much for the budget.

3. The ship commander is an idiot. They try to play him as some sort of thoughtful, Picard type who agonizes over the burden of command. I don&#039;t wanna see that! I wanna see a commander COMMAND! Make a damn decision! A party lost in deep space needs a LEADER, not a vote-taker. LEAD!

4. The whole thing with the communication stones is completely implausible, both in terms of technical capability and in terms of plot elements. I&#039;m sure the average wife is going to plop into bed with the daily &quot;rent a body&quot; of the main character. Sure she will. And geebus! Talk about ethically challenged! What kind of selfish narcissist would take someone else&#039;s body and go have sex with it? Even if the implausible plot device were remotely feasible, the FIRST rule the military would put in place is &quot;Don&#039;t have sex in someone else&#039;s body.&quot; DUH!

5. And then there are the characters... Some of them have some redeeming qualities. The first show or two I thought &quot;Math boy&quot; was pretty clever. Now, not so much. The Senator&#039;s daughter is alternately portrayed as a strong willed, principled woman, and a teenage slut. And what&#039;s the deal with the violence-prone army grunt? Geez, throw him out an airlock already!

Anyway, I&#039;m still watching it, but I can&#039;t say it is doing much to improve my opinion of television in the 21st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll probably regeret this since S:U is the only TV show I watch right now and I watch it with the Cosmic Wife, but here is my opinion of the show:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p>It&#8217;s pace is glacial. And the glaciers are melting. It&#8217;s not just that nothing happens, it&#8217;s that nothing takes FOREVER to happen. And then you get to more nothing.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>I really do think that the show&#8217;s production team was told to do the show on the smallest possible budget. I just can&#8217;t come up with any other reason for the stories they&#8217;ve come up with so far, all of which are filmed in the least interesting settings imaginable. Interminable shots in the desert. Interminable shots in the tiny area of the ship they are able to get to. Interminable shots in contemporary earth settings. With modern computer graphics capability I can&#8217;t understand why they can&#8217;t tell stories that have some remotely interesting setting. So I have to conclude that even the cost of a green screen or two is too much for the budget.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The ship commander is an idiot. They try to play him as some sort of thoughtful, Picard type who agonizes over the burden of command. I don&#8217;t wanna see that! I wanna see a commander COMMAND! Make a damn decision! A party lost in deep space needs a LEADER, not a vote-taker. LEAD!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The whole thing with the communication stones is completely implausible, both in terms of technical capability and in terms of plot elements. I&#8217;m sure the average wife is going to plop into bed with the daily &#8220;rent a body&#8221; of the main character. Sure she will. And geebus! Talk about ethically challenged! What kind of selfish narcissist would take someone else&#8217;s body and go have sex with it? Even if the implausible plot device were remotely feasible, the FIRST rule the military would put in place is &#8220;Don&#8217;t have sex in someone else&#8217;s body.&#8221; DUH!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>And then there are the characters&#8230; Some of them have some redeeming qualities. The first show or two I thought &#8220;Math boy&#8221; was pretty clever. Now, not so much. The Senator&#8217;s daughter is alternately portrayed as a strong willed, principled woman, and a teenage slut. And what&#8217;s the deal with the violence-prone army grunt? Geez, throw him out an airlock already!</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m still watching it, but I can&#8217;t say it is doing much to improve my opinion of television in the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drax</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491267</link>
		<dc:creator>Drax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491267</guid>
		<description>Stargate: Universe has the problem of many shows...TOO MANY CHARACTERS.

Don&#039;t care about a one of them any more than I did Battlestar -- too many stories, none told well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stargate: Universe has the problem of many shows&#8230;TOO MANY CHARACTERS.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t care about a one of them any more than I did Battlestar &#8212; too many stories, none told well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobarista</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491265</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobarista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491265</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Stargate fan, particularly since I have the whole collection and it&#039;s highly watchable while working out on the crosstrainer.  

Universe appears to be trying to be BSG with their low-light shooting, everyone not trusting the scientist guy who has his own agenda, and lots of shakey camera work.  I still kind of like it, but they&#039;d better move to something interesting quick, or it&#039;ll be canceled.  The &quot;supply crisis of the week&quot; format is getting old, and their only encounter with aliens was a CGI thing that got tossed out the &#039;gate after they stuffed it into a garbage can - not exactly inspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Stargate fan, particularly since I have the whole collection and it&#8217;s highly watchable while working out on the crosstrainer.  </p>
<p>Universe appears to be trying to be BSG with their low-light shooting, everyone not trusting the scientist guy who has his own agenda, and lots of shakey camera work.  I still kind of like it, but they&#8217;d better move to something interesting quick, or it&#8217;ll be canceled.  The &#8220;supply crisis of the week&#8221; format is getting old, and their only encounter with aliens was a CGI thing that got tossed out the &#8216;gate after they stuffed it into a garbage can &#8211; not exactly inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pianoman</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491261</link>
		<dc:creator>pianoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491261</guid>
		<description>CC/Drax, you guys are right about the bland.  It&#039;s a snooze fest.  I typically watch MNF with the 30-second skip-ahead button firmly under my left index finger; I get a lot less prattle and can typically see the entire game in less than an hour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC/Drax, you guys are right about the bland.  It&#8217;s a snooze fest.  I typically watch MNF with the 30-second skip-ahead button firmly under my left index finger; I get a lot less prattle and can typically see the entire game in less than an hour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drax</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491253</link>
		<dc:creator>Drax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491253</guid>
		<description>Oh, and most of us know a vet or three.  It&#039;s just that a &quot;vet&quot; ain&#039;t what a &quot;vet&quot; used to be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and most of us know a vet or three.  It&#8217;s just that a &#8220;vet&#8221; ain&#8217;t what a &#8220;vet&#8221; used to be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drax</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491252</link>
		<dc:creator>Drax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491252</guid>
		<description>The problem is that, in order to make 3-4 hours of listening to someone interesting, you need at least one &quot;interesting&quot; person.

The problem with most &quot;interesting&quot; people is that they are either &quot;interesting&quot; for the wrong reasons for the bulk of society (e.g., Limbaugh) or are only &quot;interesting&quot; to a small niche (e.g., Miller, Kornheiser, &quot;Chuckie&quot;).

MNF seems to have given up after Miller and Kornheiser in their quest for the next Madden and have gone for bland.

They succeeded in bland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that, in order to make 3-4 hours of listening to someone interesting, you need at least one &#8220;interesting&#8221; person.</p>
<p>The problem with most &#8220;interesting&#8221; people is that they are either &#8220;interesting&#8221; for the wrong reasons for the bulk of society (e.g., Limbaugh) or are only &#8220;interesting&#8221; to a small niche (e.g., Miller, Kornheiser, &#8220;Chuckie&#8221;).</p>
<p>MNF seems to have given up after Miller and Kornheiser in their quest for the next Madden and have gone for bland.</p>
<p>They succeeded in bland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CosmicConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491244</link>
		<dc:creator>CosmicConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491244</guid>
		<description>Thanks pianodude, I wasn&#039;t sure about Kornheiser. The thing with play-by-play is that announcers calling plays are NOT (no pun intended) the &quot;skill&quot; position for MNF. For the most part on TV play-by-play mostly just drones into the background. Radio needs good play-by-play but TV just needs someone to remind you what down it is and how many yards the play covered.

I may be being too hard on Jaws. I don&#039;t really have anything against him, and maybe the dynamic between him and Gruden is just accentuating Jaws&#039; traits.

What I do know is that I find the whole package to be monumentally irritating and uninformative. Just about the only things I want from the MNF crew is to be informed and entertained and that&#039;s pretty much exactly what I don&#039;t get. Gruden is the absolute master of stating the obvious, but he doesn&#039;t just &quot;state&quot; it, he is &lt;i&gt;assertive&lt;/i&gt; about it, as if it never occurred to anyone on the planet that Ben Rothlesberger was a big, strong, play-extending quarterback who has won a couple of Super Bowls. I just wanna reach into the TV and SMACK him to make him shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks pianodude, I wasn&#8217;t sure about Kornheiser. The thing with play-by-play is that announcers calling plays are NOT (no pun intended) the &#8220;skill&#8221; position for MNF. For the most part on TV play-by-play mostly just drones into the background. Radio needs good play-by-play but TV just needs someone to remind you what down it is and how many yards the play covered.</p>
<p>I may be being too hard on Jaws. I don&#8217;t really have anything against him, and maybe the dynamic between him and Gruden is just accentuating Jaws&#8217; traits.</p>
<p>What I do know is that I find the whole package to be monumentally irritating and uninformative. Just about the only things I want from the MNF crew is to be informed and entertained and that&#8217;s pretty much exactly what I don&#8217;t get. Gruden is the absolute master of stating the obvious, but he doesn&#8217;t just &#8220;state&#8221; it, he is <i>assertive</i> about it, as if it never occurred to anyone on the planet that Ben Rothlesberger was a big, strong, play-extending quarterback who has won a couple of Super Bowls. I just wanna reach into the TV and SMACK him to make him shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pianoman</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491243</link>
		<dc:creator>pianoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491243</guid>
		<description>Kornheiser was in the booth last year.  Gruden replaced him.  The play-by-play is done by Mike Tirico.

I think Tirico is fine as a play-by-play guy.  Maybe not as good as Michaels, but good enough for MNF.  But Gruden has no business being there; he&#039;s too young to stop being a coach.  He needs more real NFL experience before trying to fill the Howard Cosell role.

Jaworski is fine, he fits his role really well.  Gruden is the big problem.  Too bad the networks couldn&#039;t take a chance on Limbaugh; they would instantly bump their ratings, and he would almost certainly make Jaworski and Tirico more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kornheiser was in the booth last year.  Gruden replaced him.  The play-by-play is done by Mike Tirico.</p>
<p>I think Tirico is fine as a play-by-play guy.  Maybe not as good as Michaels, but good enough for MNF.  But Gruden has no business being there; he&#8217;s too young to stop being a coach.  He needs more real NFL experience before trying to fill the Howard Cosell role.</p>
<p>Jaworski is fine, he fits his role really well.  Gruden is the big problem.  Too bad the networks couldn&#8217;t take a chance on Limbaugh; they would instantly bump their ratings, and he would almost certainly make Jaworski and Tirico more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047&#038;cpage=1#comment-491233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cosmicconservative.com/weblog/?p=6047#comment-491233</guid>
		<description>I thought all the Stargate series looked pretty cheap next to Battlestar Galactica.

I saw The Box this past weekend and I sort of liked it.  It was basically what I expected from the guy who brought us Donnie Darko; great idea; interesting film; unnecessarily complicated plot.

Richard Kelly is what you get if David Lynch tried to make mainstream movies.  Still, I say give it a whirl.

I&#039;m going to see 2012 this weekend.  I think I&#039;ll get what I pay for on that one but the effects look great.

I say check out either of those two films.  (And go rent Ghost Image gosh darn it!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought all the Stargate series looked pretty cheap next to Battlestar Galactica.</p>
<p>I saw The Box this past weekend and I sort of liked it.  It was basically what I expected from the guy who brought us Donnie Darko; great idea; interesting film; unnecessarily complicated plot.</p>
<p>Richard Kelly is what you get if David Lynch tried to make mainstream movies.  Still, I say give it a whirl.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to see 2012 this weekend.  I think I&#8217;ll get what I pay for on that one but the effects look great.</p>
<p>I say check out either of those two films.  (And go rent Ghost Image gosh darn it!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
